Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elsa Jacquemot vs Katie Boulter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jacquemot vs Boulter analysis and find out who is favored!
Elsa Jacquemot vs Katie Boulter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jacquemot 0 - 0 Boulter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jacquemot has won 41.04% of points on their second serve, while Boulter has won 45.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jacquemot, in recent form, has won 54.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Boulter has won 56.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.84% and 34.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jacquemot has saved 52.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boulter has saved 56.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jacquemot has won 57.5% of matches played (W/L 46/ 34), with Boulter winning 63.79% (W/L 37/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jacquemot has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Boulter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 62/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 15/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Jacquemot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.32% of matches (W/L 38/ 25), where as Boulter has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jacquemot has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.9 while Boulter has played against players with an average rank of 175.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jacquemot has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boulter has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jacquemot has converted 45.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boulter has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
149
Rank
143
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
28
Rank
27
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
53% (134-120)
Career Total W/L
62% (311-192)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$273,923
Career Prize Money
$1,626,305
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elsa Jacquemot | Katie Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (38/34) | 59% (34/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (347/340) | 54% (293/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 75% (12/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 138 | 71 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.52 |
| DFs Total | 150 | 139 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:2 | 1:39:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 318.53 | 118.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1315/2198) | 56% (952/1704) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (853/1315) | 69% (661/952) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (372/883) | 45% (341/752) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (134/297) | 45% (90/200) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1051/2314) | 43% (750/1731) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 83% (10/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 35% (20/7) | 27% (11/3) |
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ana Bogdan
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
65%
(
97 of
150)
1st Serve %
54%
(
68 of
127)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
14
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
6 of
32)
45%
(
67 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
140
Total Points Won
137
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Heather Watson
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Olivia Gadecki
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
7
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Katarina Zavatska
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Katie Boulter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Katie Boulter
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Harriet Dart
40%
(
19 of
47)
1st Serve %
38%
(
18 of
47)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Katie Boulter
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Katie Boulter
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Clara Burel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Katie Boulter
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Katie Boulter
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacquemot Vs Boulter Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
